The Broken Windows That San Diego Won't Fix:

San Diego residents seek curfew for Colina Del Sol Park

 When "No Response" Becomes Policy

New York's proven approach to urban disorder contrasts sharply with San Diego's paralysis, raising questions about political accountability ahead of November elections

TL;DR: The Broken Windows That San Diego Won't Fix

The Core Problem: San Diego parks have become centers of crime, drug use, and violence after dark. At Colina del Sol Park, residents have endured three years of escalating disorder—public drug use, vandalism, trespassing, defecation in apartment stairwells, a stabbing, and a fatal shooting—while city officials refuse to implement even basic remedies.

New York Did It Right: In the 1990s, New York used "broken windows" policing—strict enforcement of minor offenses to prevent escalation to serious crime. The approach worked: NYC transformed from America's most dangerous city to one of its safest. The core principle: address disorder early before it becomes entrenched.

San Diego Does Nothing: Despite a 2023 city investigation recommending a simple 10 p.m. park curfew, the City Council has taken zero action for three years. Council-member Elo-Rivera's response to the crisis: he was "in meetings" and would "try to respond." This isn't resource constraints—it's political indifference.

Broken Windows Theory Proved Right: The Colina del Sol escalation perfectly validates broken windows theory: unchecked public drinking led to vandalism, then property destruction, then trespassing, then violence. Each stage could have been prevented by basic enforcement. None was implemented.

November Accountability: San Diego voters face municipal elections in November 2026. The question: will they reelect officials who spent three years ignoring documented safety problems, or demand leaders who actually govern? If inaction carries no political cost, expect more deterioration across all policy areas.

The Bottom Line: San Diego knows how to fix this problem—New York proved it works. Officials have the authority, the budget, and the community support. They've simply chosen not to act. Whether that changes depends on whether voters remember in November that performance should matter.

The contrast could hardly be starker. In the 1990s, New York City confronted rampant crime and disorder in its public spaces with a strategy that became nationally influential: the "broken windows" theory of policing, which held that addressing minor offenses and visible disorder prevented escalation to serious crimes. The approach, controversial but measurably effective, transformed New York from America's most notorious urban danger zone into one of its safest large cities.

In San Diego today, facing similar challenges of park disorder, public drug use, and escalating violence, municipal authorities have adopted a diametrically opposite approach: studied inaction, bureaucratic delay, and what residents describe as institutional indifference to their safety concerns. The question heading into November's elections is whether voters will hold officials accountable for choosing paralysis over proven solutions.

The Broken Windows Legacy: What New York Got Right

The broken windows theory, articulated by social scientists James Q. Wilson and George Kelling in 1982, posited that visible signs of disorder and neglect—like broken windows left unrepaired—signal that nobody cares, encouraging further deterioration and more serious crime. Applied to policing by New York Police Commissioner William Bratton in the mid-1990s under Mayor Rudy Giuliani, the strategy emphasized strict enforcement of quality-of-life offenses: public drinking, vandalism, turnstile jumping, aggressive panhandling, and similar violations.

Critics charged that broken windows policing led to over-enforcement in minority communities and contributed to mass incarceration. These concerns merit serious consideration. However, the core insight—that disorder begets more disorder, and that visible enforcement of community standards prevents escalation—proved empirically sound. New York's crime rates plummeted through the 1990s and early 2000s, with reductions far exceeding national trends.

The broken windows approach rested on several key principles directly relevant to San Diego's current park crisis. First, no violation was too minor to address if it signaled broader disorder. Public urination, vandalism, and illegal park occupancy after hours warranted enforcement not because these acts were inherently serious, but because tolerating them invited more serious criminal activity.

Second, consistent enforcement mattered more than severity of punishment. The goal was not to incarcerate turnstile jumpers, but to establish clear behavioral expectations and demonstrate that violations would prompt consequences. Third, visible police presence and rapid response to disorder prevented problems from becoming entrenched. Regular patrols and quick cleanup of vandalism denied disorder the opportunity to normalize.

San Diego's Alternative: Institutional Paralysis as Policy

San Diego's approach to the Colina del Sol Park situation—and similar problems at parks citywide—represents the antithesis of broken windows policing. Municipal authorities have adopted what might be termed "broken windows ignored": a policy of allowing disorder to escalate unchecked until conditions become intolerable, at which point officials express vague intentions to "try to respond" without implementing concrete measures.

Consider the timeline at Colina del Sol Park. Residents began reporting serious problems years ago. By 2023, conditions had deteriorated sufficiently that District 9 representatives conducted a formal investigation, documenting vandalism, fires, illegal dumping, trespassing onto private property, and public defecation. The investigation recommended a 10 p.m. curfew—a modest measure used successfully in countless municipalities.

Nearly three years later, that recommendation remains unimplemented. The City Council has taken no action. Police enforcement remains sporadic at best. Residents report that problems have intensified, culminating in a stabbing at the park in 2023 and a fatal officer-involved shooting near park property in fall 2024. Throughout this escalation, official response has been characterized by delay, deflection, and studied indifference.

When contacted about the ongoing crisis, Council-member Sean Elo-Rivera—who represents the district and presumably received the 2023 investigation report—was "in meetings all day" and could only promise to "try to respond to the issue." This non-response to a three-year-old crisis that has produced violent crimes epitomizes San Diego's governance failure.

The Predictable Consequences of Non-Enforcement

The broken windows theory predicts exactly what residents near Colina del Sol Park describe: unchecked minor disorder escalates to serious crime. When park users observe illegal activity occurring without consequence night after night, the message is clear: normal rules don't apply here. This attracts more illegal activity, drives out legitimate users, and creates conditions where violence becomes more likely.

The progression at Colina del Sol follows this pattern precisely. Initial problems involved public drinking and marijuana use—relatively minor offenses. Absent enforcement, behaviors escalated to vandalism, fires, and property destruction. As disorder became normalized, trespassing onto adjacent properties increased. Apartment residents found strangers bathing in their hot tubs and defecating in their stairwells. Eventually, the concentration of illegal activity and lack of social control created conditions where violent confrontations occurred, resulting in stabbings and shootings.

At each stage, intervention could have prevented escalation. A visible police presence enforcing park closure times would have discouraged overnight occupation. Consistent citations for public intoxication and drug use would have established behavioral expectations. Rapid cleanup of vandalism and dumping would have signaled that the community maintained standards. None of these measures were implemented consistently.

The failure isn't resource constraints—implementing a 10 p.m. curfew and conducting regular evening patrols requires no significant new funding. The failure is one of political will and institutional prioritization. San Diego's leadership has chosen not to enforce order, despite having clear authority, documented evidence of need, and community support for action.

Political Accountability and November's Reckoning

San Diego voters face municipal elections in November 2026, offering an opportunity to evaluate whether officials who have presided over deteriorating park safety deserve continued tenure. The Colina del Sol situation provides a clear test case for political accountability.

District 9 residents can assess whether Council-member Elo-Rivera's promise to "try to respond" constitutes acceptable performance after three years of inaction on a problem that has produced violent crimes. Citywide, voters can evaluate whether the City Council's collective failure to implement recommended safety measures reflects leadership deserving reelection.

The political calculus should be straightforward. Officials received constituent complaints documenting serious safety problems. City staff investigated and recommended specific remedies. Community groups organized to advocate for action. Violent incidents demonstrated the seriousness of conditions. Throughout this process, spanning years, the City Council took no meaningful action to address resident concerns.

This isn't a case where officials faced difficult tradeoffs between competing values or limited resources. The recommended measure—a nighttime park curfew—is neither expensive nor controversial in principle, being widely used in municipalities nationwide. The failure to implement it reflects either incompetence or indifference, neither of which voters should reward with continued office.

The Broader Pattern: Governance Failure Across Issues

The park safety crisis exemplifies broader patterns in San Diego governance that extend beyond any single issue. City officials demonstrate remarkable capacity to study problems, commission reports, hold hearings, and express concern, while proving singularly unable to implement actual solutions. This performance of governance without substantive action wastes resources while allowing problems to metastasize.

Across policy areas—homelessness, infrastructure maintenance, public safety, housing affordability—San Diego exhibits similar patterns. Officials acknowledge problems, create task forces, develop plans, then fail to execute. The result is a city with comprehensive policy documents and deteriorating real-world conditions.

This disconnect between official process and actual outcomes suggests deep dysfunction in municipal governance. Whether the obstacles are political fragmentation, bureaucratic ossification, or leadership failure, the impact on residents is the same: declining quality of life despite paying taxes meant to support functional city services.

What Effective Governance Would Look Like

The contrast with New York's broken windows era is instructive not because that approach was perfect—it wasn't—but because it demonstrated that focused political leadership could reverse urban decline through consistent enforcement of community standards. San Diego need not replicate all aspects of 1990s New York policing to learn from its core insights.

Effective governance of the park safety crisis would involve several elements. First, immediate implementation of the 2023 recommendation for a 10 p.m. curfew at Colina del Sol Park and similar facilities experiencing problems. Second, deployment of regular police patrols during evening hours to enforce the curfew and existing ordinances against public drug use, vandalism, and trespassing.

Third, installation of enhanced lighting, security cameras, and physical design improvements that make parks less attractive for illegal overnight activity. Fourth, coordination with social service providers to offer assistance to individuals whose presence in parks stems from homelessness or addiction, while maintaining enforcement against illegal behavior. Fifth, regular communication with residents about enforcement actions and outcomes, demonstrating that complaints produce results.

None of these measures requires revolutionary policy innovation or massive budget increases. They represent standard municipal governance: identifying problems, implementing appropriate responses, enforcing existing laws, and maintaining community standards. That San Diego has failed to execute such basic functions for years reveals profound governance deficiencies.

The November Question: Accountability or Acceptance?

As November approaches, San Diego voters face a fundamental choice: accept continued governance failure or demand accountability from officials who have presided over deteriorating conditions. The park safety crisis provides a clear, concrete test case where official performance can be objectively evaluated.

Residents near affected parks can ask their representatives straightforward questions. Why was the 2023 curfew recommendation not implemented? What specific actions have you taken to address constituent safety complaints? What prevents you from deploying regular police patrols to enforce existing ordinances? Why should residents believe promises of future action given years of past inaction?

Candidates challenging incumbents can offer clear contrasts. A commitment to implement recommended safety measures within 90 days of taking office. Regular public reporting on enforcement actions and park safety metrics. Accountability for constituent complaints, with documented responses rather than vague promises to "try to respond."

The broken windows that San Diego won't fix aren't just physical deterioration in parks. They're broken promises to constituents, broken accountability mechanisms that should connect citizen complaints to official action, and a broken social contract where residents pay taxes for services that officials fail to deliver.

Whether voters remember this failure in November depends partly on continued advocacy by groups like Colina Neighbors, whose petition efforts document community demands for action. It depends on media coverage that connects specific governance failures to officials responsible for them. And it depends on voters themselves deciding that performance matters, that years of inaction warrant electoral consequences.

The Cost of Continued Inaction

If San Diego voters reelect officials who have demonstrated consistent inability or unwillingness to address park safety despite years of complaints and documented problems, the message to future Councils will be clear: governance failure carries no political cost. Residents can organize, petition, document problems, and endure deteriorating conditions, but officials face no consequences for ignoring them.

This would establish a troubling precedent extending far beyond park safety. It would signal that municipal government can ignore constituent concerns on any issue without electoral accountability. The inevitable result would be further deterioration across policy areas as officials learn that performance and responsiveness are optional.

Alternatively, if voters hold officials accountable—defeating incumbents who failed to address documented safety concerns—the message would be equally clear: governance is not performative bureaucracy but delivery of results. Officials who cannot or will not implement basic safety measures after years of constituent complaints and staff recommendations will lose office.

The choice facing San Diego mirrors choices facing cities nationwide: accept managed decline under unresponsive governance, or demand that officials demonstrate competence by addressing concrete problems with proven solutions. New York in the 1990s chose the latter path, imperfectly but effectively. San Diego has so far chosen the former.

November will reveal whether voters endorse that choice or demand something better. For residents using apartment stairwells as makeshift bathrooms because park occupants displaced by official indifference trespass on their property, for families who can't safely use public parks their taxes support, for communities enduring violence that predictable escalation from unchecked disorder produces, the stakes could hardly be higher.

The broken windows remain unfixed. The question is whether voters care enough to fix the government that won't fix them.

---

Sources and Citations

1. Wilson, James Q., and George L. Kelling. "Broken Windows: The police and neighborhood safety." The Atlantic, March 1982. Available at: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1982/03/broken-windows/304465/

2. Corman, Hope, and Naci Mocan. "A Time-Series Analysis of Crime, Deterrence, and Drug Abuse in New York City." American Economic Review 90, no. 3 (2000): 584-604. Available through: https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/aer.90.3.584

3. Harcourt, Bernard E., and Jens Ludwig. "Broken Windows: New Evidence from New York City and a Five-City Social Experiment." University of Chicago Law Review 73, no. 1 (2006): 271-320. Available at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclrev/vol73/iss1/

4. Shin, Tony. "San Diego residents report ongoing problems at city park." FOX 5 San Diego / KUSI, February 5, 2026. (Article text provided by user)

5. City of San Diego, Office of Council District 9. Internal investigation report on Colina del Sol Park conditions, 2023. (Referenced in news reporting; formal report not publicly available)

6. Colina Neighbors community advocacy group. Petition for Colina del Sol Park curfew implementation. Change.org, 2026. (Referenced in news reporting)

Note: This analysis draws on both the specific Colina del Sol Park situation reported by Tony Shin and broader scholarship on broken windows policing, urban disorder, and municipal governance. The comparison to New York's experience rests on extensive academic literature evaluating broken windows policing outcomes. Claims regarding San Diego's governance patterns reflect the documented timeline of inaction at Colina del Sol Park and similar patterns observable in municipal responses to constituent concerns across policy areas. Information regarding November 2026 elections reflects standard municipal election cycles; specific candidates and ballot measures were not available through search at time of writing.