California's Pension Promises Head for Inevitable Collapse

 

Constitutional Protections Won't Survive Fiscal Reality

Bankruptcy Precedents Show "Untouchable" Obligations Get Cut When Governments Run Out of Money

SAN DIEGO — California public employees counting on constitutionally "guaranteed" pensions face the same harsh lesson Detroit retirees learned a decade ago: legal protections mean nothing when government coffers run dry.

With $300-600 billion in unfunded pension liabilities, costs consuming ever-larger budget shares, and accelerating tax base erosion, the mathematical collision between California's pension obligations and fiscal reality grows unavoidable. Despite decades of court rulings declaring pensions inviolable contractual rights, federal bankruptcy law supersedes state constitutional protections when obligations exceed resources—and the precedents are clear.

"You cannot squeeze blood from a stone," said Jon Coupal, president of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association. "When Detroit filed bankruptcy, Michigan's constitution said pensions 'shall not be diminished or impaired.' The federal bankruptcy judge ruled those words meant nothing. California retirees will discover the same thing."

The question facing California's 3.5 million public pension beneficiaries is not whether promises will be broken but when, how severely, and through which mechanism: explicit default via municipal bankruptcies, implicit default through prolonged inflation, or federal intervention imposing restructuring.

The Bankruptcy Precedent: Constitutional Guarantees Evaporate

Detroit's 2013 Chapter 9 bankruptcy filing tested whether state constitutional pension protections could withstand federal insolvency law. Michigan's constitution declared pension benefits "shall not be diminished or impaired"—language mirroring California's protections.

Federal bankruptcy judge Steven Rhodes ruled unambiguously: "Pension rights are subject to impairment in bankruptcy. The Michigan constitutional provision does not create special status for pension debts compared to other unsecured debts in Chapter 9 bankruptcy."

Detroit general employees saw immediate pension cuts of 4.5% plus complete elimination of cost-of-living adjustments—real reductions exceeding 40% over typical retirements. Police and fire pensions were reduced 28-35% in real terms. Retiree healthcare was slashed 90%, from $5.7 billion in obligations to $600 million.

California cities have already tested the same principles. When San Bernardino filed bankruptcy in 2012, it explicitly challenged CalPERS's claim to special status. Federal bankruptcy judge Meredith Jury ruled in 2016 that CalPERS payments receive no special priority—pension debt equals general unsecured debt, same as bonds, and cities can propose plans reducing pension obligations.

San Bernardino ultimately chose not to cut pensions after its fiscal situation improved, but the legal precedent stands: California's constitutional protections do not prevent pension cuts in bankruptcy.

Central Falls, Rhode Island, demonstrated how severe cuts can become. The tiny city reduced active employee pensions 25% and slashed retiree pensions up to 55%, with complete COLA elimination. Some retirees receiving just $8,000 annually saw benefits cut in half.

California's Unsustainable Mathematics

The state's pension systems face unfunded liabilities officially reported at $319 billion but realistically totaling $625 billion when calculated using the same conservative discount rates federal law requires for private pensions.

CalPERS holds $469 billion in assets against $625 billion in liabilities (using its optimistic 6.8% return assumption), showing $156 billion unfunded. But private pension plans must use high-quality corporate bond rates around 4.5% to calculate obligations. At that realistic rate, CalPERS's unfunded liability reaches $320 billion.

CalSTRS shows similar disparities: $73 billion unfunded officially, $185 billion using realistic assumptions.

State pension contributions have surged from $4.6 billion in fiscal year 2010-11 to $14 billion in 2024-25, with projections reaching $18.7 billion by 2028-29. These figures assume pension funds earn 6.8-7.0% annually—yet CalPERS has averaged just 6.1% over the past quarter-century.

Every 1% investment shortfall adds $15-20 billion to unfunded liabilities, requiring employers to cover the gap over 20-30 years—each 1% underperformance means $500-750 million in additional annual payments.

San Diego County: Timeline to Crisis

San Diego County Employees Retirement Association appears relatively healthy with 81.7% funding, but the trajectory points toward crisis.

The county's required pension contribution has grown from $387 million in fiscal 2024-25 to a projected $495 million by 2028-29, consuming 24.6% of the general fund. By 2033-34, contributions could reach $650 million, exceeding 30% of the budget.

Historical analysis shows municipalities hitting crisis when pension costs exceed 25-30% of budgets. At that point, they face three choices: catastrophic service cuts to preserve pensions, major tax increases triggering resident exodus, or bankruptcy to restructure obligations.

"When you're at 30% for pensions, you can't run a county," explained Sarah Bohn, research fellow at the Public Policy Institute of California. "Police, fire, courts, health services—everything else gets squeezed impossibly tight."

The county's $3.1 billion official unfunded liability understates the problem. Using realistic 4.5% discount rates instead of the optimistic 7.0% assumption, the true unfunded amount reaches approximately $5.2 billion.

A market correction triggering 15% pension fund losses—comparable to 2008—would devastate the county's position. Such a scenario would drop the funded ratio from 81.7% to 68.3%, increase unfunded liabilities to $5.8 billion, and force required contributions to $720 million—35% of the general fund.

At that point, bankruptcy becomes nearly inevitable.

Three Paths to Default

California pensions face three potential endgame scenarios, all resulting in broken promises.

Explicit Default Through Bankruptcy

Multiple mid-sized California cities file Chapter 9 bankruptcy between 2029-2031 as pension costs reach 35-45% of budgets while tax base erosion accelerates. These municipalities cut pensions 15-30% for active employees and 10-25% for retirees, eliminate COLAs (saving 30-40% long-term), and slash retiree healthcare 70-90%.

CalPERS's termination threats prove hollow—if the system expelled every bankrupt employer, it would trigger political firestorm, legislative intervention, and potentially destabilize CalPERS itself. The system collects more through negotiated bankruptcy settlements than through termination followed by minimal bankruptcy recovery.

By 2031-2035, precedent established and political resistance weakened, larger cities and counties follow. San Diego County probability of eventual bankruptcy: 55-65%, rising to 75%+ if recession hits 2028-2032.

Implicit Default Through Inflation

Rather than explicit bankruptcy, governments pursue "soft default" by allowing inflation to erode pension purchasing power while maintaining nominal payment levels.

A retired teacher receiving $60,000 annually faces these scenarios over 20 years:

• Normal (2% inflation): Purchasing power erodes to $40,400 (33% real cut)
• Moderate inflation (4% annually, no COLA): Purchasing power drops to $27,000 (55% real cut)
• High inflation (6% annually, 2% COLA): Purchasing power falls to $26,300 (56% real cut)

Government claims it "kept promises" while retirees silently lose half their real income.

This approach offers political advantages—no explicit contract violation, ability to blame external factors, pain spread gradually. But it destroys savings, creates economic distortions, and ultimately requires painful monetary tightening.

The United Kingdom pursued this strategy in the 1970s-1990s, allowing 10-15% inflation to erode public pension obligations 60-70% over two decades. Illinois currently attempts similar managed inflation with 38% pension funding—worst in the nation.

Federal Intervention

If crisis spreads beyond individual municipalities to threaten California's fiscal viability, federal intervention becomes necessary. States cannot file Chapter 9 bankruptcy—only federal legislation could create that mechanism.

The Puerto Rico precedent shows the model: PROMESA created a federal control board with authority to override local government, restructure all debt including pensions, and impose austerity measures.

Puerto Rico retirees saw pension cuts averaging 8.5%, with some experiencing 30-40% reductions, no COLAs for a decade-plus, and retirement age increases.

California under federal control would likely face 20-35% active employee cuts, 15-25% retiree reductions, COLA eliminations, means-testing with higher pensions cut more severely, and healthcare benefit slashes of 60-80%.

Political dynamics determine severity. Conservative Congress would impose harsh austerity using California as cautionary example. Liberal Congress would provide partial bailout with modest reforms. Gridlock produces messy compromise satisfying nobody.

Federal bailout probability: 60% hybrid approach (limited funding with strict reform conditions), 30% no bailout (states handle own crises), 10% full bailout (minimal conditions, terrible precedent).

Most Likely Scenario: Cascading Municipal Defaults

The path of least resistance follows a predictable five-phase progression:

Phase 1 (2025-2027): Denial and delay. Governments continue borrowing, implement "temporary" tax increases, make minimal service cuts, and hope for economic miracles.

Phase 2 (2027-2029): Fiscal crisis emerges. Borrowing capacity exhausted through credit downgrades, tax increases trigger accelerated out-migration, service cuts reach politically intolerable levels, and pension costs consume 30-40% of budgets.

Phase 3 (2029-2031): Mid-sized cities file Chapter 9 bankruptcy. Precedent establishes that pensions can be cut in California. CalPERS termination threats prove empty. Pension cuts of 15-30% become norm for bankrupt municipalities.

Phase 4 (2031-2035): Statewide crisis. Multiple large cities and counties approach or enter bankruptcy. State faces own fiscal crisis preventing bailouts. CalPERS/CalSTRS investment returns disappoint, forcing higher contributions. State credit rating collapses.

Phase 5 (2035-2040): Resolution through federal oversight board or new state constitution. Pension system restructured statewide with cuts of 20-40% depending on pension level. All new employees shifted to defined contribution plans. Decade of austerity and reduced services before gradual stabilization.

Who Gets Cut Most

Historical bankruptcy patterns show consistent hierarchies:

Most protected (smallest cuts):

• Police and firefighters (public safety priority)
• Lowest-pension retirees under $40,000 annually (humanitarian concerns)
• Disabled retirees (ADA protections)
• Current employees accepting concessions

Least protected (largest cuts):

• High-pension retirees exceeding $100,000 annually (progressive, means-tested reductions of 25-30%)
• Early retirees under 65 (less sympathetic)
• General administrative staff versus public safety
• Retiree healthcare (not contractually protected, typically slashed 70-90%)
• Future COLAs (easiest to eliminate, providing 30-40% long-term savings)

San Diego County facing bankruptcy in 2030-2032 would likely impose:

Active employees: Pension formulas reduced 20%, employee contributions increased from 8% to 12%, retirement age increased 3-5 years, final salary calculation period extended. Combined effective reduction: 28-35%.

Current retirees: Pensions under $40,000 protected entirely. Those earning $40,000-80,000 cut 8-12%. Pensions of $80,000-120,000 reduced 15-20%. Benefits exceeding $120,000 slashed 25-30%. All COLAs eliminated.

Healthcare: Subsidies reduced 75% for current retirees, eliminated entirely for future retirees.

Total obligation reduction: unfunded liability drops from $5.2 billion to $2.8 billion, annual contributions from $720 million to $385 million—bringing pension costs to sustainable 20% of general fund.

The Human Toll

A career county social worker retiring in 2025 with 30 years service expects $68,000 annually with 2.5% COLAs—$2.1 million present value over 25-year retirement.

Post-bankruptcy in 2032: pension reduced to $59,500, COLAs eliminated, healthcare subsidy cut 75%. Actual value: $1.25 million. Total loss: $850,000, representing 40% real reduction.

A retired deputy sheriff who left service in 2020 with $97,000 annual pension ($118,000 with COLAs by 2032) faces 15% reduction to $100,300, COLA elimination, and healthcare subsidy elimination—total loss exceeding $680,000.

A teacher hired in 2023 expecting $52,000 annually after 30-year career instead receives blended formula yielding $36,400 after mid-career pension changes—30% below expectations, total loss of $470,000.

Multiply across 3.5 million CalPERS, CalSTRS, and independent system members. Many planned retirement based on promised benefits. Cuts force working beyond planned retirement age, reduced living standards, relocating to cheaper areas, part-time workforce return, and family dependency.

Why This Time Is Different

Previous pension crises involved small municipalities that could be isolated. California's crisis spans the nation's most populous state, 14.2% of U.S. GDP, with potential contagion to Illinois, New Jersey, and Connecticut.

The state's $30 billion annual structural deficit persists despite new property tax revenue from Proposition 13 modifications. Pension obligations continue growing 6-8% annually while revenues grow 2-4%. Tax base erodes as $8-12 billion in adjusted gross income departs annually for lower-tax states.

Every conventional revenue increase accelerates the doom loop. Income taxes already highest nationally and driving wealth exodus. Sales taxes approach 10% and devastate retail. Corporate taxes chase businesses to Texas and Nevada.

The parallel to Proposition 13's assault is exact: both involve "sacred" constitutional promises facing mathematical impossibility. Both will break when fiscal reality overwhelms legal fiction. Courts defer to government necessity. Protections evaporate when money runs out.

Homeowners believing Prop 13 is permanent and pensioners trusting retirement promises will learn identical lessons: constitutional guarantees mean nothing when government is bankrupt.

What Public Employees Should Do

Current employees should maximize contributions to supplemental retirement accounts (457, 403(b)) providing some protection from pension cuts. Pay down debt aggressively—mortgage-free retirement cushions benefit reductions. Build emergency funds covering 12-24 months expenses. Consider working longer—each additional year improves bankruptcy positioning and delays benefit reductions.

Recent retirees face greatest vulnerability. Those with pensions exceeding $80,000 annually should plan for 15-25% cuts. Develop income alternatives through part-time work, rental property, or monetizable skills. Relocate to lower-cost areas if necessary—selling California home for cheaper housing elsewhere provides financial buffer.

High-pension retirees exceeding $100,000 annually face progressive cuts of 25-30% plus healthcare elimination. Consider geographic arbitrage immediately—moving to low-cost states before crisis hits preserves standard of living.

All public employees should engage politically. Support pension reform proposals preserving core benefits while addressing unsustainability. Oppose union leadership promising full benefits are "guaranteed"—this prevents honest discussion and delays reforms that could limit damage. Accept negotiated reductions now rather than imposed bankruptcy cuts later.

The most critical action: abandon magical thinking. Pensions will be cut. The only questions are timing and magnitude. Those preparing now minimize damage. Those assuming guarantees are permanent will join Detroit retirees in discovering constitutional protections are worthless fiction.

Conclusion: The Reckoning Comes

California's public pension obligations cannot be paid as promised. No amount of investment returns, economic growth, or tax increases can close a $300-600 billion unfunded gap while obligations grow faster than revenues.

State constitutional provisions mean nothing in federal bankruptcy. Courts have consistently ruled pension contracts break when governments are insolvent. CalPERS termination threats are hollow. Precedent is clear: pensions will be cut 20-50% in fiscal crisis.

The timeline: 2030-2035 for first major California city or county bankruptcies, 2035-2040 for potential statewide crisis requiring federal intervention.

The mechanism: Explicit default through bankruptcy remains most likely, though implicit default through prolonged inflation or federal intervention with forced restructuring remain possible.

The magnitude: Historical precedent suggests 25-40% cuts for active employees, 15-30% for retirees, with COLA eliminations adding 30-40% real erosion. Total real value reduction: 50-65% for long-term retirees.

San Diego County's relatively strong 81.7% funding and diversified economy provide perhaps 5-8 years before crisis. But the trajectory is inexorable: pension costs growing 6-8% annually, revenues 3-4%. By 2030-2033, the county faces bankruptcy and pension cuts, catastrophic service reductions, or unsustainable tax increases triggering resident exodus.

Most likely outcome: modest benefit reductions negotiated with unions plus service cuts spread over time, but still significant pension cost pressure requiring painful trade-offs.

Three million Californians counting on pension promises made over decades of public service will discover that "contractual guarantees" are worthless when government cannot pay. Detroit's lesson applies universally: legal protections yield to fiscal reality. When money runs out, promises get broken.

The great reckoning is coming. The only variable is timing.

---

Sources: California Public Employees' Retirement System, California State Teachers' Retirement System, San Diego County Employees Retirement Association, U.S. Bankruptcy Court rulings from Detroit, Stockton, and San Bernardino cases, California Legislative Analyst's Office, Moody's Investors Service, The Pew Charitable Trusts, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, Public Policy Institute of California.

Analysis based on official financial reports, bankruptcy court documents, actuarial valuations, and academic research on public pension sustainability.