Posts

Showing posts from March, 2026

The Road Not Taken: What a Serious Fiscal Reform Would Actually Look Like

Image
San Diego's Fiscal Crisis: Why Reform Fails & Taxes Rise | Claude ▌ Sidebar Analysis Companion to main report, p. 1 San Diego's $110 million structural deficit is a personnel and pension problem addressed by a vacant homes tax. The arithmetic does not work — and the political reasons why are not hidden. $258M FY 2026 budget deficit — the starting point $110M Projected structural deficit, FY 2027–28 $9–24M IBA projected annual vacant homes tax revenue The vacant homes tax, under its most optimistic scenario, covers roughly 9–22 percent of the city's projected structural deficit. The remaining 78–91 percent must be found elsewhere — or isn't found at all, and services continue to erode. To understand why the city is reaching for a constitutionally fragile, enforcement-challenged tax on a few thousand beach houses instead of addressing its spending structure directly, follow the money — specifically, the campaign money. ...

Sidebar Analysis · San Diego Fiscal Reform

Image
How to Get Out of the Pit ▌ March 2026 A structural conflict of interest — union money flowing to officials who negotiate union contracts — is the engine of San Diego's fiscal dysfunction. Closing it is possible. But the path out is littered with legal traps that must be designed around from the start. The death spiral  The Mechanism of Capture San Diego's fiscal crisis is not primarily a revenue problem or a spending problem. It is a governance corruption problem — structural, legal, and self-reinforcing. Understanding the loop is prerequisite to breaking it. ▌ The Self-Reinforcing Capture Loop ① ▶ Public employee unions fund council campaigns — AFSCME, firefighters, police associations are consistently among the largest donors in San Diego city elections. ② ▶ Union-backed council members are elected . They hold the authority to ratify ...

The True Consequence Matrix:

  ▌ Sidebar Analysis Companion to main report, p. 1 What San Diego's Vacant Homes Tax Is Likely to Actually Do A sober accounting of intended outcomes, probable failures, and the perverse effects that policy designers either did not anticipate — or chose not to discuss publicly. ■ Intended Consequences ✦ Intended — Likely Partially Achieved Increased housing supply in coastal submarkets. The measure's core rationale: compelling owners of vacant second homes to either sell or rent, adding units to a deeply undersupplied market. Research on comparable programs in Vancouver confirms this effect is real but modest — the C.D. Howe Institute's 2024 difference-in-difference analysis found approximately 5,355 fewer vacant units in Vancouver over five years as a result of that city's tax. The San Diego effect, targeting fewer than 3,000 qualifying properties in a city of 830,000 housing units, would be proportionally smaller — measurable in sp...

San Diego City Council advances empty second homes tax to June ballot

San Diego City Council advances empty second homes tax to June ballot San Diego's Empty Homes Tax: A City Council Gamble Fraught With Constitutional Peril, Enforcement Gaps, and Fiscal Uncertainty The San Diego City Council voted 8-1 to place a vacant second-homes tax on the June 2026 primary ballot — even as a near-identical measure in San Francisco was struck down by the courts as unconstitutional and awaits appellate review. Critics warn voters may be approving a measure that will never take effect. By Staff Investigative Reporter | The Epoch Times | San Diego, California ⬛ BLUF — Bottom Line Up Front San Diego's City Council has advanced a ballot measure that would impose annual taxes of $8,000–$15,000 on vacant second homes beginning in 2027. The measure faces serious constitutional headwinds: San Francisco's nearly identical "Empty Homes Tax" was ruled unconstitutional by a Superior Court judge in 2024 under the Ellis Act — a ruling n...